240°

Games for Change Challenges The White House's Misguided Video Reel With This Beautiful Showcase

After last week's misguided video reel on violent games posted by the White House, Games for Change challenged it with a counter showcase of the most beautiful and awe-inspiring moments in titles such as Horizon, Zelda, Ori, Abzû, The Last of Us, Shadow of the Colossus, Firewatch and many more.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
KaiPow2272d ago

What a beautiful way to counter that video they put together in bad taste.

NecrumOddBoy2272d ago (Edited 2272d ago )

No one is doubting games as art but the medium has content not suitable for children. Parents are ultimately responsible for their healthy upbringing.

DarkOcelet2272d ago

The only people to blame for having violent games in the hands of children are the parents. They are the ones who should be monitoring their child. The games that have violence in them usually are rated M or higher which is intended for adults.

sampsonon2271d ago

agreed. don't understand why the down votes for pointing that out.
you don't want teens walking into a school shooting everyone? stop selling them rifles.
we in Canada play games just as much as people do in the states and the reason we don't have mass shootings is, well it's really really simple actually, we don't sell guns to just anyone and we have a lot less on the streets.

simple i know.

madforaday2271d ago

That is the problem because the games that get showcased to the public are games that are usually the most violence. If you go and talk to random people on the street and ask them about Video games, they are going to mention, Battlefield, COD, Halo, GTA, Mario and a few others. Most of the games that are HUGELY popular are extremely violent games. Do you think people know about Flower? Or the countless of games that have an amazing artistic look and feel to them?

Just think about the Oscars, the movie that wins best picture are usually some movie that mostly no one ever heard of or saw. You rarely see a violent action film win best picture. I am looking through the ones that won, the closest one I see to an action film is Hurt Locker in 2009 or The Departed in 2006. Almost a decade ago I had to go to find something violent.

_-EDMIX-_2271d ago (Edited 2271d ago )

agreed.

At the end of the day this comes down to Parenting because we already have the ESRB system and many retailers that will deny the sale of a violent video game to minors.

@Dark agreed

UCForce2271d ago

@DarkOcelet You are goddamn right.

SuperSonic912271d ago

Video games is just like any medium of expression - music, theatre, television, radio, books, film, etc .
It can be used for great good or great evil.

I am a great believer in video games as the best medium of expression today.

This is a wake up call for developers, publishers and gamers alike for responsible gaming.

For The Glory of Gaming Forever May He Reign!
- Kevin Butler VP of PlayStation

rainslacker2271d ago

Of course it has content not suitable for children. That's why ratings boards exist. I don't think that anyone denies there is content not suitable for children, just the extent to which that content has on the child's psyche. But, it's not for us, or anyone but the parents to decide how their child should be raised, and if those parents don't care, what more can be done other than to censor to ruin it for everyone else.

I'm not one to say everyone should be denied guns because of these recent instances of violence. I'd like the same consideration that not all games need to be censored because some children may get their hands on them. Children get their hands on porn too, but the porn industry is still going strong.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2271d ago
_-EDMIX-_2271d ago

Well I understand why they put the video out I also don't believe it's something that really needs to be combated simply because the medium has a rating in regards to the ESRB so violent content can exist like that in the first place.

So at the ending of the day I don't really believe that anyone needs to prove or give any type of evidence that games many times are not violent because I don't really believe that the argument nearly even needs to be about the violence and games as much as it's about that we already have a rating system for that type of content in the first place.

It would be like trying to say let's show you a bunch of family friendly films to prove to you that it's not just violent films that exist... I mean I don't disagree with that that's all well and good but like video games there's a rating system that exist for a reason.

It is very clear that the video that the White House put out was completely out of context, but they could show us much violent video game footage as they want I believe those games have the right to exist no different than games that are non-violent. All this is is desperation to push the agenda towards something other than the abundance of high-powered Weaponry in this country.

rainslacker2271d ago (Edited 2271d ago )

A couple of the games shown in this video have violent content in them. TLOU in particular is extremely violent, not just from Joel, but Ellie, as a teenage girl, who will viciously attack someone and stab them to death. The game is quite graphic in its depiction of violence, and it was intentional by the developer to help drive home just how cruel the world they live in is.

And that's where the game comes down to art. The fact that despite humanity being on the brink of despair, or past it, there is still good in the world worth living for. That no matter how bad things are, there is always something that can be appreciated....there is something worth living for.

One could show all the great scenes in TLOU, or all the most brutal, in some reel, but when you strip all context from either, it lessens the impact of both.

Games, at least those with stories, at their very core, are a package deal. If all you show is the violence, then you ignore the purpose of that violence. If you only show the good stuff, then you don't appreciate it fully because you don't know what it means to the story or characters. Context is key, and those that want to blame video games love to remove all context.

This video, as nice as it was, also removes the context. Again, pointing to TLOU, the giraffe scene has no context. It looks good sure, and one can imagine the inspiration, but they don't actually know.

I'm sure we could all agree that the violence itself will have a much bigger impact on the uninitiated in terms of what they feel about the game itself.

_-EDMIX-_2271d ago

I completely agree with you regarding the last of us but I simply feel that violence inside of video games is 100% okay regardless of the context because we have a rating system anyway.

So even if they're trying to cherry-pick or show content out of context I don't think it should matter in the first place considering regardless of the actual violence itself there's a rating system designed for it anyway.

rainslacker2271d ago

I agree, it doesn't matter if it's in or out of context from a general point of view.

There was that one game where you played as a psychopath. Can't remember the name, but it was a couple years ago. It got banned from Steam.

The general consensus seemed that it was in bad tastes, so the market seemed to take care of itself. I think most people don't want to play as someone who's just violent without purpose. They want context, and they want purpose. If that doesn't exist in a game, then it tends to be looked at as a bad game because that context is part of the experience.

rainslacker2271d ago

I really do enjoy videos which celebrate games as art.

There are so many more games that could have been shown. So many that you wouldn't have a single repeat in the whole thing, and it could last ten times as long.

Many games are made to awe the player, and in many cases, they can be inspiring.

ccgr2271d ago

Haven't played any of the games listed but they're on my ever growing backlog

Alexious2271d ago

Really? These are masterpieces

2271d ago
Jinger2271d ago

What have you been playing then!?

Brave_Losers_Unite2271d ago

Donald Trump just couldnt he his damn mouth shut. The buffoon is so quick to criticize everything

madforaday2271d ago

You make it sound like he doesn't have people in both ears telling him what to do, say, and wear. Trump and presidents in general are just someone that the people can point to because it is easy to. Of course, with Trump it is much easier to point since well, it is Trump. Who lets a boy walk around with no parents aimlessly in NYC lol

2271d ago
Show all comments (35)
80°

Fortnite leak shows first Season 4 skin with new gameplay feature

A fresh Fortnite leak potentially shows the first skin for Season 4 to accompany a brand new gameplay feature.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
190°

Sony shares big new PS Plus stat, but not the one we want to see

PlayStation Plus has improved the split of PS4 and PS5 players on its priciest tiers, but Sony continues to hide total subscriber numbers.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
mandf19h ago

lol acting like it’s equivalent to ms numbers

Mr Logic19h ago

Uh...They're definitely not equivalent.

"Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass service now has 34 million subscribers."

"the total number of PS Plus subscribers across all tiers was 47.4 million"

darthv7219h ago(Edited 18h ago)

That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN.

bloop15h ago

That's not the "gotcha" you think it is Darth.

darthv7214h ago

^^it's not supposed to be bloop.... it's just an interesting observation.

Einhander197213h ago

darthv72

"That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN."

Have you ever heard of a PC before? I hear they are pretty popular.

fr0sty7h ago

MS started lumping gold subscribers in with those GP numbers... keep in mind.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 7h ago
shinoff218318h ago(Edited 18h ago)

What. Definitely more os plus subscribers but that makes sense due to actual console sales

Darth the difference between the bases are huge your right but you gotta think. Ps players buy more games, where as the Xbox base relies on gamepass for their gaming. So it makes perfect sense

darthv7217h ago(Edited 17h ago)

What makes perfect sense though? You say PS players buy more games... so then logically there should be more PS+ subscribers given the increased number of online multiplayer games in the PS4 generation alone. The PS4 was the first time that + was required for online play much like Gold was for 360 users.

Keep in mind we are talking subscribers, not simply XB/PS users. I assume you meant to say offline single player games, which is most likely true as well. That gen also saw a significant increase in games with an online component comparted to the previous gen.

victorMaje17h ago

I for one will be going back to essential at the next renewal. When I feel a game is good & right up my alley, I’ll check trusted reviews & just buy it.

jznrpg16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

I have the top tier until 2028 as they gave me a massive discount for all the years I had left but I’ll most likely go to essential as well. I buy my games but my kids do use the service occasionally. They do prefer to own their games as well since any game can leave the rental service at some point and they don’t like that idea. They mostly use it to demo games then ask me to buy games if they really like it.

RedDevils11h ago

For me, I will cancel it all together but unfortunately I still have it till 2030 lol

meganick15h ago

I would like to see Sony add a fourth tier of PS Plus for people who just want to be able to play games online without any of the perks like monthly games, store discounts, or anything like that, and it should cost $20 annually, $30 maximum. There’s no way I’m paying $80 just to play games online. Even the original $60 fee was too much, and I would often wait for sales to re-up my subscription.

P_Bomb11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Essential is too expensive, I agree. We’ve got one Essential and one Premium sub. Dropping the Premium when it expires.

gamerz8h ago

Just let my subscription lapse for the first time since 2010. Will sub again every now and then for a month or so to access my old ps+ games but for me it's the end of an era.

DivineHand1258h ago

Let those numbers continue to drop because it is now too expensive. $80 per year just to play online. I noticed they didn't offer any discounts on the subscription or controllers during this year's days of play for the first time in many years and they will feel it when people choose not to renew.

My subscription will lapse next month and it will stay that way until further notice.

KevtheDuff4h ago

There were savings on subs and controllers here in the UK? I bought a controller yesterday in the sale..
It would be weird if those deals were not in other territories too?

60°

Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 3 will see the return of a popular healing item and overpowered Pistol

The new modified vehicles can be tricky to deal with, but many classic items are set to return to Fortnite to even the odds.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com