PlayStationing writes: "This might not be the best thing for a PlayStation-focused website to admit to, but it’s the truth. Microsoft won E3 this year and Sony, whilst they did show some good games, got their conference very very wrong. This is why."
Days Gone director claims Sony has already poured in at least a $250M in Bend's project; says Days Gone sold more than Death Stranding.
Well that sucks. Seems they want more online trash. I'd rather of had the sequel if it was single player
It would be a shame if it was true that Hermen never gave the franchise a chance simply because he didn't like it and they already had a "Zombie" game with TLOU.
NaughtyDog are most likely moving onto a new IP next so it would have been the perfect time to do it.
Oh great so we only get what the big wigs want… y’know, the people that really have their fingers on the pulse of what their consumers want. Faaaaantastic!
Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie. This is something of a homecoming, as Microsoft owns Activision.
Manages to buy their freedom especially after all the shit Microsoft has been doing with its studios lately
...
Goes right back to them as partners.
Okaaaaaay...
Xbox’s gaming division seems to still function as 3 semi-autonomous sub-divisions, Xbox Studios, Bethesda and ABK. The three main sub-divisions can seemingly shut down or build studios and set up partnerships independently. This would explain why Bethesda can recently shutdown studios, while ABK spins off one studio, while building a new one. Plus, Toys for Bob could be spun off by ABK, only to immediately re-partner with Microsoft.
PlayStation Plus has improved the split of PS4 and PS5 players on its priciest tiers, but Sony continues to hide total subscriber numbers.
I for one will be going back to essential at the next renewal. When I feel a game is good & right up my alley, I’ll check trusted reviews & just buy it.
I would like to see Sony add a fourth tier of PS Plus for people who just want to be able to play games online without any of the perks like monthly games, store discounts, or anything like that, and it should cost $20 annually, $30 maximum. There’s no way I’m paying $80 just to play games online. Even the original $60 fee was too much, and I would often wait for sales to re-up my subscription.
Just let my subscription lapse for the first time since 2010. Will sub again every now and then for a month or so to access my old ps+ games but for me it's the end of an era.
Let those numbers continue to drop because it is now too expensive. $80 per year just to play online. I noticed they didn't offer any discounts on the subscription or controllers during this year's days of play for the first time in many years and they will feel it when people choose not to renew.
My subscription will lapse next month and it will stay that way until further notice.
I won’t lie about it. MS did better than Sony this year. I think next year will be another victory for MS and Sony will lose next year.
Microsoft "Won" E3. So whats the prize?
In any case, I agree that the Sony press conference was terrible,and I hope they don't repeat that format for a conference ever again. The problem is that Sony have PSX which is becoming their primary stage for big announcements, so it makes sense for them to leave some big hitters until then.
This has to be satire. I dont see how you win when you annouce buying 4 studios, show the same franchises and sequals everyone knew you would talk about, show some third party trailers then annouce your working on new hardware when you just re released ypur platform 8 months ago.....Im baffled how they won.
I was looking for games and Sony delivered. Rest doesn't matter.
How they won with all multiplatform games and gears and Forza as usual? Another stupid article.