80°

Where Could Sony's Purchase of Bungie Go?

Welcome back Link Cable Gaming fans, Zahi here after the aftermath of another huge announcement in companies buying more companies. Sony Interactive Entertainment bought one of them (at the time) a few active independent studios out there, Bungie for 3.6 billion $. As a personal long-time fan of the company and of the worlds they create, where could a partnership like this lead?

Read Full Story >>
linkcablegaming.com
isarai847d ago (Edited 847d ago )

Sounds like it's more of a partnership/investment than Sony's typical acquisitions, giving them better security and growth but staying multiplatform and slightly more independent. I was hoping we would see a single player affair as a result, but it sounds like live service is where they wanna stay which is a bummer to me, but whateves.

Zahiar847d ago

Thank you for your comment isarai. Love to hear the feedback.
You know, I’m hoping one of the games they have in development is a Sony single player exclusive.

Lightning77847d ago

You're just gonna sweep it under the rug about Sony churning out a bunch of Live Service stuff? Man if this was any other company it would be pitchforks at the gates. A few Live service games is fine and dandy but releasing 10 in 4 years is going overboard and it doesn't guarantee quality of those games. I can only see 2 or 3 being pretty good.

Seems like Sony gets a free pass on everything they said they're not gonna be doing.

isarai847d ago

Ummm... what? This is about Bungie, not their statement on "10 live service games". Since you asked i'm not "sweeping it under the rug" i already stated in another comment that i hope they arent using their top talent for that because Sony 1st party games have always had a something special about them, and turning them into live service shills would ruin it for me. And honestly would really kill the platform for me, or at least drastically damage my affinity for it. They dont get a "free pass" i criticize them all the time, demand better and you get better.

ApocalypseShadow847d ago (Edited 847d ago )

No. We're just going to sweep this comment under the rug.

The one thing Gamers said Sony lacked on was multiplayer online games. They have single player on lock. They bought Bungie who does service games. They didn't announce that Naughty Dog, Sucker Punch, Sony Santa Monica etc would start making service games.

Horizon FW, Spider-Man 2, Wolverine, GOW, a future Ghost of Tsushima 2, etc don't look like service games to me. Sony knows to take care of single player gamers. Just like making or publishing VR games like Farpoint, Astrobot, Iron Man, and Blood and Truth didn't cut into single player flat games.

2 possible games a year for online players is not extreme. That's the investment in Bungie. Give online gamers something for them. There will be possibly another announcement or acquisition of a company that only does service games. Or, the Bungie hiring spree and 3.6 billion is to cover and invest in those games.

"But but but the sky is falling. The wolf is near."

You tell us what Sony should do to keep online gamers on their platform who like playing online games? And, after recent announcements of Microsoft buying publishers who specialize in making online games, that might lead PlayStation gamers to migrate to Xbox. After 70-80 billion dollars spent, that still puts Microsoft behind Sony. Sony wants to keep their position and their market share and keep their profits from slipping.

Lightning77847d ago

Ummm... what? This is about Bungie, not their statement on "10 live service games".

You mentioned live service in your comment hence the comment.

I agree as long as it doesn't become a huge focus and Sony continues to deliver their bread and butter which AAA narrative story based games.

isarai847d ago

I also mentioned the word "sound" doesn't mean we're talking about music or sound design. Subjects are more than a single word bro.

ApocalypseShadow847d ago (Edited 847d ago )

Still waiting for those answers.

They bought one company that does online service games. The question is on who is the other developer or if Bungie is capable of launching 2 a year like Activision making their yearly COD. Now, compare those 2 service games to the amount of developers Sony has that makes single player games.

What if Sony announces MAG online reboot or Socom online or the return of Warhawk online reboot for PS5. Does that interfere with games like Wolverine, Ghost or Spider-Man 2? Nope

Unless Sony drastically changes their model of making single player games in favor of services games which we know they won't, it's fear mongering.

But the question remains, what does Sony do to keep their online base from migrating when there's over 40 million online Plus members currently? What does Sony do to counter and keep their revenue position compared to a big publisher buying company that pushes online gaming and will soon take away multiplatform online games.

We're all waiting for these answers instead of, "if this was any other company" spewing.

70°

Every PlayStation Studios game available now on Windows PC

Windows Central writes: "Many PlayStation Studios games that are ported to PC get dedicated PS5 DualSense support, which allows users to experience haptic feedback and adaptive trigger support without actually having to own a PS5.

According to Hermen Hulst, head of PlayStation Studios, it's still the company's intent to launch the bigger single-player games on PS5 first, before later bringing the games to PC. This might not be the case for multiplayer games however, which are considered okay to launch simultaneously on console and PC."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
ocelot076h ago

My guess is after god of war. Probably last of us 2 that's a almost 4 year old game now and by the time it's released on pc it will be more than 4 years old or close to 5.

Elda58m ago

Every old Playstation game that is now on PC.

200°

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie. This is something of a homecoming, as Microsoft owns Activision.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
Obscure_Observer17h ago

Very very early in development. Still, fantastic news!

Let´s GO!!!

Lightning7715h ago

I guess.

How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )

At least it wouldn't be MS of all ppl destroying them.

MS really should let go Tango go like they did TFB here.

darthv7215h ago(Edited 15h ago)

one was under Bethesda (Tango) the other under Activision (TFB). Clearly each one handled the separations of their subordinates differently.

Obscure_Observer14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

"How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )"

Perhaps because Zenimax and ABK handles such matters differently based on their own internal policies as "independent" publishers.

Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future. Which could also be the reason why they ensured an exclusive partnership with TFB and its new game, before anyone else.

Sad and disgusting. But it is what it is.

Lightning7711h ago(Edited 11h ago)

"Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future."

MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB.

It's inexcusable, they have options on how to handle studios they don't want anymore with killing jobs. Not just MS but the rest of the industry also.

Sad and disgusting sure how many will get shut down next year or this year even?

I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another.

Obscure_Observer3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

"MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB."

Imo, MS separated from TFB because they didn´t had a game associated with Xbox yet, unlike Tango.

"I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another."

Fair enough. It was indeed an epic dumb move from them to close Tango.

Still, all to be forgotten, like always have. This is not the first time a big publisher shuts down a beloved and/or successful studio out of nowhere and certainly won´t be the last. Do you remember Lionhead? Do you remember Evolution Studios? Yeah... both were beloved studios and yet, those companies kill those studios in q blink of an eye and got away with it.

anast1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

The studio boss made some money from this transaction. Once the game releases, the studio will get chopped up.

-Foxtrot17h ago

Manages to buy their freedom especially after all the shit Microsoft has been doing with its studios lately

...

Goes right back to them as partners.

Okaaaaaay...

darthv7215h ago

Id venture a guess that TFB working directly with MS was a better outcome than working through Activision to get to MS.

VersusDMC13h ago

From the article...

"Toys for Bob spun out as an indie back in February after Microsoft instituted sweeping layoffs that impacted 86 employees, which was more than half of the staff"

I doubt those 86 employees enjoyed the Microsoft experience over Activisions.

Inverno13h ago

MS shuts down studios because of lack of resources and then helps these guys by giving em resources. Also MS is what forced them to buy their freedom in the first place? What kind of logic 😂

Chevalier9h ago

The best thing is that the company that is worth $3 trillion and owns the company instead of Xbox lacks resources. How the hell does a company worth $3 trillion making a measly $70 billion purchase they 'can't' support. Lol

Sciurus_vulgaris15h ago(Edited 15h ago)

Xbox’s gaming division seems to still function as 3 semi-autonomous sub-divisions, Xbox Studios, Bethesda and ABK. The three main sub-divisions can seemingly shut down or build studios and set up partnerships independently. This would explain why Bethesda can recently shutdown studios, while ABK spins off one studio, while building a new one. Plus, Toys for Bob could be spun off by ABK, only to immediately re-partner with Microsoft.

Chevalier9h ago

That's absolutely 💯 BS. Any sane 'autonomous' company would NOT put their games on Gamepass day 1 like COD will lose probably billions.

Also they're all under Xbox game studios so any autonomy is an illusion.

Elda9h ago

Either a kiddie game or something uninteresting.

Obscure_Observer3h ago

Don´t worry. You won´t be playing it anyway since their next game will possible be a next gen Xbox console game.

Elda2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Don't worry about my comments.

Show all comments (20)
130°

What Happens to Your Steam Account When You Die?

The Outerhaven writes: While Steam has come out recently, stating that Steam accounts can't be transferred, we need to think about it since we all will eventually kick the bucket. But if Valve is denying transferring accounts, what can be done? Plenty, actually.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
thorstein1d 18h ago

It goes to my kids because I gave them the passwords.

To Steam: Missio has a song that conveys my feelings about you stealing my purchase after I die. It's called "Middle Fingers"

shinoff218323h ago

Pretty much. My son knows my info.

Abear2123h ago

Yeah worrying about digital ownership when you’re on the other side of the grass seems a little strange, but also on brand for these millennial journalists to worry about.

qalpha8h ago

I'm sure Keith will be happy to hear he's a millennial journalist.

Goodguy011d 3h ago

I suppose if I have kids, I'd just give em my account details by retirement age. If I die young then...idk lol.

CrimsonWing691d ago

Yea, I mean just give someone the password to your account. Is that difficult to do or something? Like, I’m legit asking because I don’t know.

anast22h ago(Edited 22h ago)

It's not difficult but It's against the policy. If they find out, they will lock the account permanently.

CrimsonWing6921h ago

Ah ok, I had a feeling there was something like that. It seems kind of weird that you can’t just hand your account over to a family member or friend and let them take over the account.

Show all comments (15)