Oof.
Almost certain he's referring to Persona 4 & 5 there (since he discusses them elsewhere in the review).
A sequel is in the works - they announced it a couple of years ago.
He said almost 3 million, not over (yet).
Each to their own, but listing the 13 best Tomb Raider games and not having the first two titles anywhere on that list is shocking. My guess is the author is either young or didn't play the original trilogy at the time.
Cheap and quick way to fill in the release calendar in-between major new games - that's why pretty much all the major publishers have been doing it.
It was really popular in Japan and NA, but not so much in Europe, which acted as a drag on its final total.
It's sitting on 63% on Steam overall. The 29% is recent reviews only, many of which are clearly a direct response to the game winning a Steam award for innovation (which itself was likely as a result of some sort of meme campaign), because that's literally the only thing some of the reviews mention.
Somehow people have funded this to the tune of over $650 million since 2012.
That sucks, especially for the staff at N4G having to deal with the fallout. I've been in a similar position and it made me feel sick.
I thought maybe you were exaggerating, but damn, you weren't; other than Arkham VR (2016) they haven't released anything since 2015's Arkham Knight. They're screwed if this ends up being half as bad as people are fearing.
Bahahaha
They have more of my favourite games in the top 25 than I expected tbh.
@fr0sty - the DualSense controller works on PC, so just use that.
The series' most overhyped and overrated (especially by critics) more like.
The GoW figure was revealed less than two months after it launched, which is why it seems low in comparison.
Days Gone was 10 months of sales, and Horizon was 17 months.
Correct. For some reason a site posting a list of scores from a completely different outlet as their own news is fine, but cutting out the middle man and posting the scores in the comments is against the rules.
For me this calls into question the credibility of all GameSpot reviews going forward, which is a shame because I've historically considered GameSpot one of the better review outlets.
And I'm not saying this because of some reflexive fanboy defence of a game I love - I haven't played it and I have no interest in the Harry Potter IP.
You can't preface your review with an attack on the IP's creator that's unrelated to the quality of...
I notice they turned the comments off for that one.
It's an OK game. The main problem is it gets very repetitive with the mission types.